NAMA for Grassland and Livestock Management in Mongolia
From NAMA Database
To edit this page, log in and click on "edit with form" above
Description
Overview | |
---|---|
Sector | Agriculture |
Focus area | Crops (incl. NO2 from fertilizer use), Livestock, Land-use (incl. peatlands) |
Type of action | Strategy/Policy |
Scope | National |
Stage | Under development |
Submitted to UNFCCC registry | No |
Start of initiative | 2013 |
Financing and support details | |
---|---|
Financing status | Seeking financing |
Total cost |
(no data)
|
Financing requested |
(no data)
|
Financing received to-date |
(no data)
|
Principal source of financing | Not known |
Principal type of financing | Not known |
Capacity building required | Yes |
Technology transfer required | Yes |
Additional information | |
---|---|
Proponent(s) | Ministry of Environment and Green Development |
International funder(s) |
(no data)
|
Organization providing technical support | ADB |
Contact |
(no data)
|
Objective:
The objective of the NAMA is to combat desertification and reduce GHG emissions in one of the most emitting sector in Mongolia
Activities:
Mongolia’s GHG emissions are produced primarily by the energy and agriculture sectors.
The NAMA can be implemented in three phases:
- Phase 1: Piloting of GHG MRV methods, results-based monitoring and evaluation system for the National Livestock Program, prioritization of barriers to adoption and identifying best practices for overcoming barriers, stakeholder consultations in the livestock and/or grassland sector, definition of roles, responsibilities, and coordination mechanisms, and submission to the UNFCCC.
- Phase 2: Complete assessment of the National Livestock Program activity lines, consultation on identification and prioritization of policies and measures on a national and local level, pilot implementation of selected activities of the National Livestock Program, pilot implementation of grassland carbon sequestration projects for carbon markets.
- Phase 3: Assessment of the supporting legal and policy framework, clarification of national-level coordination,
approval procedures, and arrangements for MRV procedures, and establishment of a climate finance mechanism.
Impact and MRV
Cumulative GHG reductions: No data available |
---|
Mitigative capacity:
No information has been provided on mitigative capacity
Co-benefits:
Social: | * improvement of livestock management |
|
Economic: |
* increased rural incomes
|
|
Environmental: |
* rehabilitation of grasslands
|
MRV Framework:
No MRV plan has been defined