Namespaces
Variants
Views

Biogas for onsite power generation for medium/large pig Farms

From NAMA Database
Jump to: navigation, search



Vietnam.png
To edit this page, log in and click on "edit with form" above
Vietnam

Description

Overview
Sector Agriculture, Waste, Energy
Focus area Renewable energy (biomass), Energy efficiency
Type of action Strategy/Policy
Scope National
Stage Under development
Submitted to UNFCCC registry Yes
Start of initiative 2016
Financing and support details
Financing status Seeking financing
Total cost US$ 239.6 mln
Financing requested US$ 196.6 mln
Financing received to-date
(no data)
Principal source of financing Multilateral
Principal type of financing Loan
Capacity building required Yes
Technology transfer required Yes
Additional information
Proponent(s) Department of Livestock Production, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development
International funder(s)
(no data)
Organization providing technical support Danish International Development Agency
Contact
(no data)
Objective:

The NAMA aims to foster the use of biogas power at pig farms in medium and large-scale farms in rural areas of Vietnam.

Activities: (2016 - 2020)
The NAMA intends to:

  • develop a policy and institutional framework to incentivize investment in commercial biogas-electricity generation at pig farms in Vietnam
  • enhance the development of biogas-electricity generation at pig farm in order to reduce GHG emission and contribute to agricultural sector target which described in the country's National Climate Change Strategy
  • improve pig farm capacity on affection abiding national regulatory standard for waste treatment.

During the implementation phase, assuming that 50% of pig farms will be implemented, it is expected that there will be about 2150 farms installed biogas power generation system with total capacity in 2020 is 215 MW. .

Impact and MRV

No Data Available.png
Cumulative GHG reductions: 6.51 MtCO2e
Mitigative capacity:

No information has been provided on mitigative capacity

Co-benefits:

Social: * health benefits
  • reduction of power shortages
  • awareness raising of the community about sanitation, clean technology, greenhouse gas, and renewable energy
  • positive model of animal manure management practice
Economic: * job creation
  • impacts on balance of payments
  • national energy self-sufficiency

•Incremental reduction on the need for new build power plants at a national level •Increasing the income of pig farm •diversification of energy supply

Environmental: * reduction of emissions
  • improvements in local air quality, and control of highly combustible methane emissions
  • reduction in odor
  • control of leach ate

MRV Framework:
No MRV plan has been defined


References

Finance will be received from three sources: International support, State contribution and Farm owner’s capital. These sources are divided to three types of funding: (1) Grant for program implementation; (2) Investment cost for 2150 systems; and (3) Loan insurance. Apart from the 196.6M$ of financial support, the NAMA will need 215M of technical support as well as 4.6M$ for capacity-building.